Are you familiar with Luigi Mangione? If you’re active on social media, you undoubtedly have seen his face trending across your Twitter feed, featured in Saturday Night Live skits, and even portrayed on popular Altar Candles that briefly captured public interest. While this shared cultural reference might allow you to casually display #FreeLuigi on your dating profile as a nod to your political views and sense of humor, it presents a significant challenge when it comes to assembling an impartial jury for his trial. A recent article in the ABA Journal delves into the complexities of jury selection in cases involving high-profile defendants like Mangione:
“This will be a tough one,” remarks Don Worley, the president and managing attorney of the personal injury law firm McDonald Worley based in Houston. “It is challenging because it will be difficult to find a potential juror who hasn’t already heard about this case. Most individuals will have formed opinions about the situation long before they step foot in the courthouse,” Worley elaborates.
To clarify, there has been significant public relations activity surrounding both potential outcomes of Mangione’s case. A notable faction of individuals who feel wronged by insurance companies view Luigi as a champion, as recent surveys indicate that approximately 60% of Americans have faced challenges with their own insurers. This support extends beyond mere sentiment; the fear of future exploitation by healthcare corporations has garnered Mangione considerable grassroots support. I have no sources to cite, but I can confidently say that many celebratory toasts were made in Luigi’s name following the sudden retraction of the anesthesia payment policy by Blue Cross just one day after the tragic death of Brian Thompson. Public support for Luigi has not only been vocal but also financial; he recently raised $300,000 from grassroots supporters to aid in financing his legal representation. The possibility of one of these contributing supporters serving on the jury raises significant concerns.
Conversely, the state has engaged in numerous activities that could potentially bias the jury pool. It’s impossible to discuss this without mentioning Eric Adams, who publicly labeled Luigi a terrorist, a statement that reverberated globally:
New York Mayor Eric Adams made headlines for his decision to visit the heliport when Luigi Mangione arrived prior to his arraignment.
“I’m not going to just allow him to come into our city. I wanted to look him in the eye and stated that you carried out this terrorist act… pic.twitter.com/ntVP8U9yYX
— Yashar Ali (@yashar) December 20, 2024
The dramatized perp walk orchestrated by Eric Adams resembled a scene from a high-budget superhero film, seemingly crafted for political gain:
A month ago today, Luigi’s perp walk coincided with the release of the new Superman trailer pic.twitter.com/cP0A3qMSxq
— Luigi Nation (@mangionethinker) January 19, 2025
Moreover, the enthusiastic support from the NYPD has contributed to the growing Luigi cult following, which further complicates the situation:
Not the NYPD posting these images from their official account as if they’re a Luigi Mangione fan account https://t.co/rerriOBKUQ
— A (@aaludumb) December 20, 2024
The article suggests that potential jury questions for voir dire could be developed through focus groups beforehand. While this is a sensible approach, the old adage “everyone has a plan until they get punched in the face” resonates strongly when considering the reality of the voir dire process. Can you envision how chaotic the actual voir dire might unfold?
Prosecution: We should consider striking juror 14.
Defense: Why, because he’s Italian?!
Prosecution: No, because he’s wearing a Deny Defend Depose hoodie and has a “Free Luigi” tattoo on his neck.
Potential Juror: What do you expect from me? I’m from Brooklyn!
Additionally, the article highlights the importance of screening potential jurors’ social media for any references to Luigi. This is a valid point, but let’s be honest: who hasn’t made a comment online about this case? Perhaps you warned friends about jumping to conclusions regarding Luigi’s guilt due to your belief in due process? That could count as a strike. Maybe you shared or reacted to a clip featuring Bill Burr passionately advocating for the “Free Luigi” cause? This poses a significant risk of jury nullification — which would lead to a dismissal. What about sharing a popular meme too close to December 4th?:
Luigi wins! Bang bang! Reaction video Nintendo Mario meme pic.twitter.com/VchdFeiOjB
— The Memes Archive (@TheMemesArchive) February 8, 2025
Thank you for your attention; the exit is conveniently located to your left.
The prosecution faces a formidable challenge. In the spirit of ensuring due process, I extend my best wishes to both the prosecution and Luigi in their quest to secure a neutral and impartial jury. Everyone involved will certainly require all the luck they can get.
What Insights Can We Gain from Luigi Mangione’s Trial Regarding the Selection of Unbiased Juries? [ABA Journal]
Chris Williams has been a dedicated social media manager and assistant editor for Above the Law since June 2021. Before joining the editorial team, he honed his skills as a minor Memelord in the Facebook group Law School Memes for Edgy T14s. He persevered through his time in Missouri to earn his degree from Washington University in St. Louis School of Law. Chris is a former boatbuilder learning to swim, a published author on critical race theory, philosophy, and humor, and he has a passion for cycling that sometimes annoys his peers. You can reach him via email at cwilliams@abovethelaw.com or follow him on Twitter @WritesForRent.
For the latest updates on litigation, regulatory changes, deals, and trends in the financial services industry, subscribe to Finance Docket, a collaborative effort between Breaking Media publications Above the Law and Dealbreaker.
