Regardless of your views on President-elect Donald Trump, it is undeniable that his wealth surpasses what most people can imagine. According to his 2024 financial disclosures, he reported an astounding income of over $160 million from his Miami golf course and an additional $56 million from Mar-a-Lago. When you consider his other golf courses, various development projects, and book royalties, his total business income exceeded $700 million in 2023. This remarkable financial success highlights not just his business acumen but also the lucrative nature of investments in the golf and hospitality industries.
Equally astonishing is the fact that Trump is likely exempt from paying any additional Social Security taxes on his income for the rest of the year, while the average worker continues to contribute until December 31. This situation isn’t a privilege granted by virtue of his status as a former president or a president-elect; it stems from a specific Social Security regulation that many workers and retirees are advocating for reform to better reflect current economic realities.
Image source: Getty Images.
Understanding the Mechanics of Social Security Payroll Taxes
Social Security operates on three primary funding sources: payroll taxes collected from workers, interest income from the trust fund’s assets, and taxes on benefits received by seniors. The most substantial source of revenue comes from payroll taxes, currently set at 12.4% for self-employed individuals. For those traditionally employed, this tax is divided equally between the employee and employer, with each contributing 6.2%. This system is designed to provide a safety net for retirees, but it presents challenges for high earners.
While most workers pay this tax on their entire income, high-net-worth individuals like Trump navigate through a loophole. The Social Security Administration only taxes income up to $176,100 in 2025, a mere fraction of Trump’s wealth. If his earnings in 2025 mirror his 2023 figures, he would net approximately $2 million daily. If we consider this average income distributed throughout the year, he would reach the taxable threshold by just after 2 a.m. on January 1. Although he will still owe income and Medicare taxes on his earnings, he will not contribute any additional funds to Social Security after surpassing that limit.
This scenario isn’t unique to Trump. While few individuals will reach the $176,100 limit as rapidly as he does, around 9 million Americans earn above this threshold and will generate income that the Social Security Administration will not tax. This situation raises significant questions about equity in the tax system and the overall sustainability of Social Security funding.
It is essential to note that if you do not pay Social Security payroll taxes, those earnings do not count toward your future retirement benefits. However, given the substantial incomes of high earners, the impact on their eventual benefits is likely minimal, further complicating the conversation about tax fairness and Social Security reform.
Public Demand for Increasing the Social Security Taxable Wage Base
One of the most discussed reforms aimed at addressing the funding crisis of Social Security is the proposal to increase or eliminate the taxable wage base. Such a change would significantly enhance revenue for the program by imposing higher taxes on affluent individuals without adversely affecting lower- or middle-class workers. This reform is increasingly viewed as a necessary step to ensure the long-term viability of Social Security.
The potential impact is immense. Consider Trump’s reported income of $700 million in 2023; if he were subjected to even a 6.2% Social Security tax, that would equate to roughly $43.4 million in contributions. This amount alone could substantially bolster the program’s financial health, underscoring the need for equitable tax structures.
However, there are two crucial considerations. First, the current Social Security benefit formula dictates that any income subject to payroll taxes is included when calculating retirement benefits. Consequently, billionaires who contribute more would also be entitled to correspondingly larger benefits, which could create resistance among high earners.
The second point is that even if the government applied Social Security payroll taxes to every dollar earned by Americans, it would only address about half of the projected $23.2 trillion funding deficit. While such a change could offer temporary relief, further actions would be necessary, such as raising the overall payroll tax rate or exploring alternative funding sources to protect retirees from future benefit cuts.
At present, it remains unclear whether the government will take steps to modify or eliminate the cap on Social Security payroll taxes. As discussions continue, time is of the essence. Current projections indicate that the trust funds may be exhausted by 2035, prompting Congress to likely consider reforms within the next decade to ensure the program’s sustainability.