Alex Jones Takes Legal Action Against Sandy Hook Parents Amid Controversy
It seems almost unavoidable that Alex Jones would initiate a lawsuit against the parents of Sandy Hook victims. Over several years, he has publicly labeled these grieving individuals as crisis actors, accusing them of orchestrating a fake tragedy regarding the deaths of their own children. This relentless harassment from Jones and his fervent followers has persisted for far too long, and now he is absurdly seeking compensation from them for his own alleged pain and suffering.
Desperate Maneuvers by Jones to Block Sale of Free Speech Systems
Jones, who has become a walking embodiment of chaos, is frantically trying to prevent the sale of his company, Free Speech Systems, to the owners of the satirical platform, The Onion. He is prepared to vilify the Sandy Hook parents yet again since they support this transaction. This legal battle underscores not just personal vendettas but also the broader implications of public perception and media influence in the age of misinformation.
Complex Legal Negotiations Surrounding Compensation for Sandy Hook Families
The intricacies of the bidding process reveal that the parents who initiated lawsuits in Connecticut agreed to waive a portion of their compensation to benefit their counterparts in Texas. Given the staggering difference in their damage awards—$1.4 billion for Connecticut plaintiffs versus $50 million for Texas—this arrangement legally allows the Connecticut plaintiffs to claim 97% of the sale proceeds. To ensure the Texas plaintiffs benefit from a deal with The Onion’s parent company, Global Tetrahedron, the Connecticut families agreed to forfeit enough of their share, approximating $100,000, benefiting their Texas counterparts significantly.
Trustee’s Dilemma: Maximizing Value Amid Legal Challenges
The transfer of assets and the commitment to share future advertising revenue with the Sandy Hook families convinced Chapter 7 Trustee Christopher Murray that The Onion’s offer was the most beneficial for all creditors, even though it was lower than another bid. However, FUAC, a shell company aligned with Jones, is contesting this decision, launching a scathing motion to disqualify Global Tetrahedron, which includes serious allegations against Murray’s conduct. In response, Murray has threatened to pursue Rule 11 sanctions against FUAC’s attorney, Walter Cicack, highlighting the escalating tensions in this legal saga.
Jones Escalates Legal Warfare Against Murray and Sandy Hook Families
In a dramatic turn, Jones has been vocally condemning the Justice Department under Trump for supposedly threatening Murray and The Onion’s CEO, Ben Collins, with imprisonment. He has even made wild predictions about Elon Musk coming to his rescue, which seems highly unlikely. Furthermore, Jones filed an outrageous complaint against Murray, Global Tetrahedron, and the Sandy Hook parents from Connecticut, demanding that US Bankruptcy Judge Christopher Lopez intervene to halt the sale, declare FUAC the legitimate winner, and enforce a series of stringent prohibitions against the defendants.
a. Cease to use, directly or indirectly, any Jones IP Rights;
b. Cease from using any reference to Alex Jones in their business or operations or suggesting or inferring that they have any rights to use of Alex Jones’s name or persona;
c. Return to the business offices of FSS and to the control of Alex Jones, who is the duly elected Manager of FSS, all assets of FSS and/or Alex Jones that have been taken;
d. Identify to Alex Jones all assets (tangible or intangible) of FSS and/or Alex Jones known to have been taken and/or secreted;
e. Cease and refrain from (i) any interference with the operation and management by Alex Jones of the business of FSS, including InfoWars, and (ii) dealing with any and all third parties in matters that relate to or concern the assets of FSS and/or Alex Jones, without the express written permission of this Court;
f. Cease to advise or publish that any of the Enjoined Parties owns or has acquired the right to own, any assets or business of FSS and/or Alex Jones, including without limitation any Jones IP Rights; and
g. Notify in writing all persons to whom any of the Enjoined Parties has told they own or have acquired the right to own, any assets or business of FSS and/or Alex Jones, including without limitation any Jones IP Rights, and advise them that statements previously made to the contrary were made in error.
Legal Complications and Free Speech Rights: A Chaotic Landscape
Setting aside the complex issues surrounding prior restraint, the logistics of simultaneously transferring assets to FUAC while also returning them to Jones, who voluntarily sought Chapter 7 liquidation, is fraught with challenges. The document filed appears to have been drafted by bankruptcy attorneys who may lack a complete understanding of the Barton doctrine, which prohibits lawsuits against a bankruptcy trustee without court approval. Furthermore, they seem to believe that media defendants possess an unassailable shield regarding matters of public significance, which is an oversimplification of the legal landscape. Had Jones not defaulted in both courts, he might have had a stronger case to present to a jury, but for now, he claims that the sale of his intellectual property to gun control advocates violates his free speech rights, and he plans to pursue financial restitution. Additionally, he argues that the judgments against him are unjustified due to various conspiratorial claims.
Texas Attorney General Joins the Fray, Raising Constitutional Questions
In an unexpected twist, Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton has entered the discussion, adding another layer of complexity to the already tumultuous scenario. This involvement raises important questions about the nature of federalism and the interplay between state and federal legal frameworks in addressing such high-profile cases. The implications of these legal battles extend beyond Jones himself, touching on broader societal issues regarding freedom of speech, media accountability, and the rights of victims’ families in the wake of tragedy.
Liz Dye lives in Baltimore where she produces the Law and Chaos substack and podcast.
For more of the latest in litigation, regulation, deals, and financial services trends, sign up for Finance Docket, a partnership between Breaking Media publications Above the Law and Dealbreaker.
