If President Donald Trump were to act on his recent threats to terminate all government contracts with billionaire Elon Musk, the implications would be profound and immediate. Such a decision would likely disrupt critical operations within the Pentagon and the Intelligence Community, particularly jeopardizing the Space Force’s National Security Space Launch program. This is primarily due to the US government’s reliance on SpaceX rockets, which play a crucial role in launching national security payloads into orbit.
The relationship between Trump and Musk has soured dramatically, transforming from one of collaboration into a bitter exchange of barbs on social media. This shift followed Musk’s pointed critiques of Trump’s substantial budget reconciliation initiative, which he aptly labeled the “Big, Beautiful Bill.” The tension has escalated, leading to a public confrontation that highlights underlying policy disagreements and personal grievances.
Trump responded to Musk’s criticisms with a bold declaration on his social media platform, stating, “The easiest way to save money in our Budget, Billions and Billions of Dollars, is to terminate Elon’s Governmental Subsidies and Contracts. I was always surprised that Biden didn’t do it!” This remark came in the wake of Musk suggesting the possibility of forming a third political party, indicating a deepening rift between the two influential figures.
In a swift retort, Musk challenged Trump with the phrase, “Go ahead and make my day!” on X, later amplifying his stance by announcing, “In light of the President’s statement about the cancellation of my government contracts, @SpaceX will begin decommissioning its Dragon spacecraft immediately.” This declaration signals the serious implications of their conflict, particularly for ongoing and future space missions.
The extent to which this social media clash is mere posturing or a precursor to real consequences remains uncertain. Both parties are grappling with the complexities of disentangling the US government from its business dealings with Musk, which span multiple sectors and programs, reflecting a tangled web of contractual obligations.
Should SpaceX’s Crew Dragon spacecraft face decommissioning, the repercussions would resonate strongly within NASA, which relies on this innovative craft to transport astronauts to and from the International Space Station. The ramifications of such a decision could delay crucial scientific missions and impact America’s leadership in space exploration.
Moreover, the potential suspension of contracts for SpaceX’s equipment and operations would have far-reaching consequences for both the Department of Defense and the Intelligence Community. The National Security Space Launch (NSSL) program is vital for space operations, particularly for the National Reconnaissance Office (NRO), responsible for developing the nation’s intelligence-gathering satellites. Currently, SpaceX’s Falcon rockets serve as the backbone for launching essential payloads into orbit.
While terminating SpaceX’s contracts with the Department of Defense wouldn’t entirely ground the Space Force, it would undoubtedly create significant delays in mission timelines. Back in 2020, the Space Force awarded contracts to SpaceX and the Lockheed Martin-Boeing joint venture, United Launch Alliance (ULA), designating them as the exclusive providers for NSSL missions under the Phase 2 program, which includes launches scheduled from fiscal year 2022 through 2027.
For the earlier missions in this timeframe, ULA proposed its Delta IV and Atlas 5 rockets for medium- and heavy-lift missions. However, for subsequent years, the company planned to utilize the new Vulcan rocket, which is notable for using US-made engines, in contrast to its predecessors that relied on Russian engines, now banned by Congress.
Despite these plans, ULA has encountered persistent setbacks in the development of the Vulcan rocket. The Space Force only certified the rocket for NSSL launches in March, and a senior Space Force official informed the House Armed Services Committee in May that ULA still has unresolved issues to address before commencing NSSL missions.
“Risk reduction plans have been agreed upon and signed by the Space Force and ULA to mitigate known risks before launching the first NSSL mission with Vulcan,” stated Maj. Gen. Stephen Purdy, acting assistant secretary of the Air Force for Space Acquisition and Integration.
The inaugural Vulcan mission, designated USSF-106, is scheduled for launch in July, representing a significant milestone for ULA.
In a strategic shift, the Space Force recently transitioned two planned missions for launching new GPS satellites from Vulcan to SpaceX’s Falcon 9, aiming to alleviate a backlog caused by delays in Vulcan’s certification process. The latest mission, involving the launch of GPS III Space Vehicle-08, achieved a remarkable turnaround time of only three months, highlighting the efficiencies of SpaceX’s capabilities.
The Space Force has also awarded contracts for essential launches under the follow-on NSSL Phase 3 Lane 2 program, which covers launches scheduled between fiscal 2027 and 2032. This involves collaboration with ULA, SpaceX, and emerging player Blue Origin, which is developing the New Glenn rocket.
Under the new contract awards, SpaceX is projected to undertake 28 NSSL Phase 3 Lane 2 missions, accounting for approximately 60 percent of the launches contracted for fiscal years 2025 to 2029, with a cumulative value of around $5.9 billion. ULA is expected to conduct 19 missions, which is about 40 percent of the total. Blue Origin is anticipated to be awarded seven Phase 3 Lane 2 missions starting in Order Year 2 of FY26, according to announcements from the Space Systems Command (SSC) on April 4.
The future NSSL program also anticipates a variety of small- and medium-launch providers competing for less critical missions destined for lower orbits, utilizing the Lane 1 acquisition track. Providers in Lane 1 face fewer certification requirements from the Space Force than those involved in NSSL Phase 3 Lane 2. So far, the Space Force has approved SpaceX, ULA, Blue Origin, Rocket Lab, and Stoke Space to participate in the program.
Ultimately, SpaceX has emerged as the preeminent US space launch provider, dominating the landscape with its launch capabilities. The company accounted for 98 of the total 109 US military, civil, and commercial launches in 2023 and 138 out of 145 launches in 2024, according to Jonathan McDowell, an astrophysicist affiliated with the Harvard–Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, who maintains an extensive open-source database on space launches.
Additionally, the situation is further complicated by the potential military applications of SpaceX’s Starlink satellite communications and the reported utilization of Starshield buses in support of the NRO’s new constellation of hundreds of satellites in low Earth orbit, raising questions about the intersection of commercial and defense space initiatives.
For more of the latest insights into litigation, regulation, deals, and financial services trends, sign up for Finance Docket, a partnership between Breaking Media publications Above the Law and Dealbreaker.
