Yesterday, Coinbase’s CEO, Brian Armstrong, took to X to express his intent to boycott Milbank due to their decision to hire recently departed SEC enforcement chief Gurbir Grewal as a partner in their New York office. This decision raises significant concerns about the ongoing revolving door phenomenon between regulatory agencies and the private sector, particularly when former regulators join firms advising the very entities they once regulated. Such transitions can create a conflict of interest, especially when those individuals may have previously enforced regulations against potential clients. However, it appears that Armstrong’s motivations are more focused on punishing large law firms for their associations with figures involved in the latest wave of crypto regulation.
The ongoing tension between the crypto industry and the SEC is palpable, as the regulator consistently challenges the narrative that crypto operates solely as a currency. This narrative often conflicts with its portrayal as a promising investment opportunity. While it is true that cryptocurrencies can be misused for illicit activities, the majority of investors do not intend to leverage their assets for illegal purchases. It is essential to recognize that the distinction between using crypto as a currency and its speculative investment potential continues to fuel debate among market participants.
Presumably.
Armstrong’s stance mirrors a past incident involving Elon Musk, who pressured Cooley LLC to dismiss an associate with SEC ties or risk losing Tesla’s business. Cooley, however, chose to remain steadfast in their decision. This scenario highlights the complexities of client-firm relationships in the legal sector, particularly when clients attempt to influence hiring practices based on past regulatory affiliations.
Interestingly, this raises the question of whether clients exerting pressure on firms to sever ties with specific partners constitutes a form of cancel culture. The evolving landscape of business ethics and client expectations makes this a relevant discussion.
Musk’s previous actions also stand in stark contrast to his current legal battles, where he alleges that encouraging boycotts of major advertisers on platform X constitutes illegal interference. He argues that advertisers refusing to place ads on the platform may violate the Sherman Antitrust Act or even criminal RICO statutes. This hypocrisy suggests that Musk’s advocacy for free speech comes with selective applications.
It seems he supports “boycotts for me, but not for thee,” illustrating a double standard in his approach to business practices.
From a strategic perspective, Coinbase’s public declaration to avoid collaborations with individuals who have previously enforced regulations against fraud in the crypto space may not reflect well on the company. The New York Stock Exchange does not sever connections with lawyers who prosecute Ponzi schemes, recognizing the importance of legal guidance in maintaining industry integrity. A more constructive approach for Coinbase would be to emphasize their commitment to user protection against scams, expressing a desire to collaborate with experienced regulators who can offer insights into identifying bad actors in this rapidly evolving landscape.
Despite the potential drawbacks of Armstrong’s proposed boycott, he is exercising his right to advocate for changes within the industry. Encouraging others in the sector to align with his position is also within his rights, though it raises questions about the potential for anticompetitive collusion. Nonetheless, the principles of free speech and market dynamics grant individuals the freedom to choose whom they engage with in business.
Ultimately, it is crucial for all parties to understand that the dynamics of this revolving door work both ways.
Joe Patrice is a senior editor at Above the Law and co-host of Thinking Like A Lawyer. Feel free to email any tips, questions, or comments. Follow him on Twitter or Bluesky if you’re interested in law, politics, and a healthy dose of college sports news. Joe also serves as a Managing Director at RPN Executive Search.
For more of the latest in litigation, regulation, deals and financial services trends, sign up for Finance Docket, a partnership between Breaking Media publications Above the Law and Dealbreaker.
